Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs GeForce 310M

Place in the ranking	1324	535
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.56	18.59
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	GT218	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	10 January 2010 (15 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	80
Core clock speed	606 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	260 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.848	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.04896 TFLOPS	no data
Gigaflops	73	no data
ROPs	4	no data
TMUs	8	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	Up to 1 GB	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	10.67 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI	no data
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management	8.0	no data
Quick Sync	no data	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12_1
Shader Model	4.1	no data
OpenGL	3.3	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 310M 0.31

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.37
+2277%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 310M 1123

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21729
+1835%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	0−1	19
1440p	-0−1	10
4K	0−1	15

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −22.2%	11 +22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −367%	14 +367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −300%	12 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −400%	30 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −11.1%	10 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −225%	26 +225%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −300%	24 +300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −917%	60−65 +917%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −50%	6 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −360%	21−24 +360%
World of Tanks	12−14 −785%	110−120 +785%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +80%	5 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −33.3%	4 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −313%	30−35 +313%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −233%	20 +233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −917%	60−65 +917%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−1850%

35−40
+1850%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −150%	10 +150%
Valorant	4−5 −375%	18−20 +375%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −20%	18−20 +20%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −20%	18−20 +20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −2100%	21−24 +2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −20%	18−20 +20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	6−7
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	14−16 −6.7%	16 +6.7%
Valorant	0−1	7−8

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	14 +0%	14 +0%
Metro Exodus	27 +0%	27 +0%
Valorant	18 +0%	18 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Dota 2	22 +0%	22 +0%
Fortnite	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	13 +0%	13 +0%
Metro Exodus	17 +0%	17 +0%
Valorant	14 +0%	14 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Dota 2	36 +0%	36 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	9 +0%	9 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	6 +0%	6 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	6 +0%	6 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
World of Tanks	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	16 +0%	16 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Fortnite	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce 310M is 80% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 2100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GeForce 310M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 27 tests (44%)
there's a draw in 33 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.31	7.37
Recency	10 January 2010	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	40 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	28 Watt

GeForce 310M has 100% lower power consumption.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, on the other hand, has a 2277.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 310M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.