ATI Rage 4 vs GeForce 3 Go

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	no data	Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code name	no data	Rage 4
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 February 2002 (22 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Boost clock speed	250 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	27 Million	8 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	2 Watt	no data
ROPs	no data	2
TMUs	no data	2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size

medium sized

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	no data
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	no data
Memory bus width	32 / 64 / 128 Bit	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DDR	6.0
OpenGL	no data	1.2
OpenCL	no data	N/A
Vulkan	-	N/A

Pros & cons summary

---

Chip lithography

150 nm

250 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---