GeForce FX Go5650 vs 210
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 210 with GeForce FX Go5650, including specs and performance data.
210 outperforms Go5650 by a whopping 725% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1367 | 1555 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.82 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | Rankine (2003−2005) |
| GPU code name | GT218S | NV31 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 October 2009 (16 years ago) | 1 March 2003 (23 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $29.49 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 589 MHz | 325 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 260 million | 80 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30.5 Watt | no data |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 4.160 | 1.300 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.03936 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | 4 |
| L2 Cache | 32 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
| Length | 168 mm | no data |
| Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR2 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 295 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 8.0 GB/s | 9.44 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | DVIVGADisplayPort | No outputs |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 9.0a |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 3.1 | 1.5 (2.1) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.33 | 0.04 |
| Recency | 12 October 2009 | 1 March 2003 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 130 nm |
GeForce 210 has a 725% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce 210 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX Go5650 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce 210 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce FX Go5650 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
