GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs 210

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	257
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	18.27
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GT218	N18P-G62
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	12 October 2009 (14 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$29.49	no data
Current price	$96 (3.3x MSRP)	$892

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	1024
CUDA cores	16	no data
Core clock speed	589 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	260 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30.5 Watt	50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	4.160	95.04
Floating-point performance	39.36 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 210 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	6.60" (16.8 cm)	no data
Height	2.731" (6.9 cm)	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	500 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	8.0 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DVIVGADisplayPort	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.5
OpenGL	3.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.140
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	12 October 2009	2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	50 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---