GRID M60-8Q vs GeForce 210 PCI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated445
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.10
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGT216GM204
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 October 2009 (15 years ago)30 August 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162048
Core clock speed475 MHz557 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1178 MHz
Number of transistors486 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate3.800150.8
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS4.825 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA1.25.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2009 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 225 Watt

210 PCI has 625.8% lower power consumption.

GRID M60-8Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 210 PCI and GRID M60-8Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 210 PCI is a desktop card while GRID M60-8Q is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
GeForce 210 PCI
NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
GRID M60-8Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 77 votes

Rate GeForce 210 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GRID M60-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.