Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated605
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.99
Architectureno dataGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameNV11Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2001 (23 years ago)28 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores164
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed166 MHz1100 MHz
Manufacturing process technology180 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt12-25 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR4
Maximum RAM amount64 MBno data
Memory bus width32 / 64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed143 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR12_1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2001 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 180 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 12 Watt

2 Go (200 / 100) has 500% lower power consumption.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)
GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 302 votes

Rate GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 237 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.