Radeon RX 6600M vs GRID M40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 K620 K1200 K2200 Tesla M10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6300M 6450M 6500 6500M 6550M 6550S 6600M 6600S 6650M 6650M XT 6700M 6700S 6800M 6800S 6850M XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M40 with Radeon RX 6600M, including specs and performance data.

GRID M40
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.96

6600M outperforms M40 by a whopping 740% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID M40 GRID M40
RX 6600M RX 6600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking746175
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.0925.56
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGM107Navi 23
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 May 2016 (9 years ago)31 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841792
Core clock speed1033 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06270.6
Floating-point processing power0.7933 TFLOPS8.659 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cache192 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−900%
100
+900%
1440p6−7
−800%
54
+800%
4K3−4
−900%
30
+900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 107
+0%
107
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 100
+0%
100
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
+0%
83
+0%
Far Cry 5 116
+0%
116
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 202
+0%
202
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 121
+0%
121
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 86
+0%
86
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+0%
69
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Far Cry 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 199
+0%
199
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 116
+0%
116
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 68
+0%
68
+0%
Metro Exodus 80
+0%
80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+0%
142
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Dota 2 104
+0%
104
+0%
Far Cry 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 168
+0%
168
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 52
+0%
52
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+0%
85
+0%
Valorant 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 61
+0%
61
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%
Far Cry 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 128
+0%
128
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 36
+0%
36
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+0%
62
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+0%
58
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 28
+0%
28
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+0%
44
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%
Dota 2 80
+0%
80
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 74
+0%
74
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how GRID M40 and RX 6600M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600M is 900% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600M is 800% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600M is 900% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.96 33.25
Recency 18 May 2016 31 May 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 100 Watt

GRID M40 has 100% lower power consumption.

RX 6600M, on the other hand, has a 739.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M40 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M40 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6600M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID M40
GRID M40
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6600M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID M40 GRID M40
vs
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
RX 6600M Radeon RX 6600M
vs
RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GRID M40 GRID M40
vs
FirePro W600 FirePro W600
GRID M40 NVIDIA GRID M40
vs
8800 GTS 512 GeForce 8800 GTS 512
GRID M40 NVIDIA GRID M40
vs
ATI V3800 FirePro V3800
GRID M40 NVIDIA GRID M40
vs
P106-100 P106 100
GRID M40 NVIDIA GRID M40
vs
UHD Graphics G4 Graphics G4
GRID M40 NVIDIA GRID M40
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
GRID M40 NVIDIA GRID M40
vs
Pro W6800X Duo Pro W6800X Duo
GRID M40 NVIDIA GRID M40
vs
RTX A4500 RTX A4500
GRID M40 NVIDIA GRID M40
vs
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU Max 38-Core GPU
R7 A260 AMD Radeon R7 A260
vs
HD Graphics P4600 Graphics P4600
R7 A260 AMD Radeon R7 A260
vs
Tegra X1 GPU X1 GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 8 votes

Rate GRID M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1112 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M40 or Radeon RX 6600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.