Radeon RX 6300M vs GRID M40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 K620 K1200 K2200 Tesla M10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6300M 6450M 6500 6500M 6550M 6550S 6600M 6600S 6650M 6650M XT 6700M 6700S 6800M 6800S 6850M XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M40 with Radeon RX 6300M, including specs and performance data.

GRID M40
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.92

6300M outperforms M40 by a whopping 287% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID M40 GRID M40
RX 6300M RX 6300M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking739380
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.0833.60
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGM107Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 May 2016 (9 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed1033 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06115.2
Floating-point processing power0.7933 TFLOPS3.686 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache192 KB256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.92 15.17
Recency 18 May 2016 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 35 Watt

GRID M40 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 6300M, on the other hand, has a 287% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6300M is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M40 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M40 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6300M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID M40
GRID M40
AMD Radeon RX 6300M
Radeon RX 6300M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID M40 GRID M40
vs
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GRID M40 GRID M40
vs
FirePro W4100 FirePro W4100
RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
vs
Xbox Series S GPU Xbox Series S GPU
RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
vs
Arc 5 A550M 5 A550M
TITAN RTX NVIDIA TITAN RTX
vs
RTX 3080 12 GB RTX 3080 12 GB
TITAN RTX NVIDIA TITAN RTX
vs
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
TITAN RTX NVIDIA TITAN RTX
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB
RTX 6000 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
vs
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050 Mobile
RTX 6000 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
vs
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
RTX 8000 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
vs
RTX 4070 GDDR6 RTX 4070 GDDR6
R5 M250 AMD Radeon R5 M250
vs
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT
R5 M250 AMD Radeon R5 M250
vs
RX 6750 GRE RX 6750 GRE

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 8 votes

Rate GRID M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M40 or Radeon RX 6300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.