P106-090 vs GRID M40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M40 and P106-090, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GRID M40
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.98

P106-090 outperforms GRID M40 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking722626
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.065.83
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM107GP106
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date18 May 2016 (9 years ago)31 July 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed1033 MHz1354 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1531 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate33.0673.49
Floating-point processing power0.7933 TFLOPS2.352 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs3248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x1
Lengthno data250 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s192.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.06.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.98 5.74
Recency 18 May 2016 31 July 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt

GRID M40 has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 50% lower power consumption.

P106-090, on the other hand, has a 44.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The P106-090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M40 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID M40
GRID M40
NVIDIA P106-090
P106-090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 8 votes

Rate GRID M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 62 votes

Rate P106-090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M40 or P106-090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.