Radeon R7 M340 vs GRID M3-3020

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 K620 K1200 K2200 Tesla M10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
R5 M315 R7 A360 R7 M340 R7 M350 R7 M360 R7 M440 R7 M445 R7 M460 R8 M365DX R8 M445DX R8 M535DX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M3-3020 with Radeon R7 M340, including specs and performance data.

GRID M3-3020
2016
4 GB GDDR5
7.00
+358%

M3-3020 outperforms R7 M340 by a whopping 358% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
R7 M340 R7 M340

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5871005
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGM107Meso
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 May 2016 (9 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640320
Compute unitsno data6
Core clock speed1033 MHz943 MHz
Boost clock speed1306 MHz1021 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate52.2420.42
Floating-point processing power1.672 TFLOPS0.6534 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4020
L1 Cache320 KB80 KB
L2 Cache2 MB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s16 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)DirectX® 12
Shader Model5.16.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.2Not Listed
Vulkan1.1.126+
Mantle-+
CUDA5.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+329%
14
−329%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 21
+0%
21
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
+0%
7
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18
+0%
18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
+0%
4
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GRID M3-3020 and R7 M340 compete in popular games:

  • GRID M3-3020 is 329% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 52 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.00 1.53
Recency 18 May 2016 5 May 2015

GRID M3-3020 has a 357.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The GRID M3-3020 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M340 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M3-3020 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 M340 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GRID M3-3020
AMD Radeon R7 M340
Radeon R7 M340
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
R7 M340 Radeon R7 M340
vs
GT 555M GeForce GT 555M
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
FirePro W5100 FirePro W5100
GRID M10-8Q NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q
vs
Jetson TX1 GPU Jetson TX1 GPU
GRID M10-8Q NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q
vs
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
RX 560 896SP AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP
vs
Arc A730M Arc A730M
RX 560 896SP AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP
vs
Arc A380M Arc A380M
Quadro P620 NVIDIA Quadro P620
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile
GRID M3-3020 NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
vs
R7 360 896SP R7 360 896SP
GRID M3-3020 NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
vs
GT 745A GT 745A
GRID M3-3020 NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
vs
GTX 660M Mac Edition GTX 660M Mac Edition
GRID M3-3020 NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
vs
GT 650M Mac Edition GT 650M Mac Edition
GRID M3-3020 NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
vs
8800 GT Mac Edition GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 351 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M3-3020 or Radeon R7 M340, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.