ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit vs GRID M10-8Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking629not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.13no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameGM107R350
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 May 2016 (9 years ago)1 March 2003 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1033 MHz380 MHz
Boost clock speed1306 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate52.243.040
Floating-point processing power1.672 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs408
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s21.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 May 2016 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 47 Watt

GRID M10-8Q has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO 256-bit, on the other hand, has 379% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID M10-8Q and Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID M10-8Q is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID M10-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M10-8Q or Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.