NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 vs Matrox G450

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, release date and other general parameters.
Place in performance rating
not rated
 
not rated
Architecture
Maxwell
 
G400
GPU code name
GM107
 
Condor
Market segment
Workstation
 
Desktop
Release date
18 May 2016
 
1 January 2001
Price now
no data
 
$130

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines / CUDA cores
640
 
no data
Core clock speed
1033 MHz
 
125 MHz
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
 
no data
Transistor count
1,870 million
 
10 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
180 nm
Texture fill rate
52.24
 
0.25
Floating-point performance
1,672 gflops
 
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GRID M3-3020 and Matrox G450 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
PCI
Length
267 mm
 
150 mm
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
 
None

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
 
DDR
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
32 MB
Memory bus width
128 Bit
 
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
5200 MHz
 
332 MBps
Memory bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
 
2.656 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on GRID M3-3020 and Matrox G450. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Display Connectors
No outputs
 
1x DVI, 1x VGA

API support

APIs supported by GRID M3-3020 and Matrox G450, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12 (11_0)
 
6.0
Shader Model
5.1
 
no data
OpenGL
4.6
 
None
OpenCL
1.2
 
None
Vulkan
1.1.126
 
N/A
CUDA
5.0
 
-

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GRID M3-3020 and Matrox G450. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
155 Mh/s
 
no data

Advantages of NVIDIA GRID M3-3020

Much newer (18 May 2016 vs 1 January 2001)
Wider memory bus (128 vs 64 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (83.2 vs 2.656 GB/s)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 180 nm)

Advantages of Matrox G450

We are unaware of any advantages of Matrox G450 over NVIDIA GRID M3-3020.

So, GRID M3-3020 or Matrox G450?

Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 and Matrox G450. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GRID M3-3020 is a workstation card while Matrox G450 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between GRID M3-3020 and Matrox G450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite graphics card.
Like
Like

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about GRID M3-3020 or Matrox G450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.