GeForce 9200 vs GRID M3-3020

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M3-3020 with GeForce 9200, including specs and performance data.

GRID M3-3020
2016
4 GB GDDR5
6.98
+1645%

M3-3020 outperforms 9200 by a whopping 1645% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5881318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.77
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGM107C78
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 May 2016 (9 years ago)6 May 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64016
Core clock speed1033 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1306 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rate52.244.000
Floating-point processing power1.672 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs408
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1300 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.98 0.40
Recency 18 May 2016 6 May 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm

GRID M3-3020 has a 1645% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GRID M3-3020 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M3-3020 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GRID M3-3020
NVIDIA GeForce 9200
GeForce 9200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 26 votes

Rate GeForce 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M3-3020 or GeForce 9200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.