GeForce 9400 GT vs GRID M3-3020

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M3-3020 with GeForce 9400 GT, including specs and performance data.

GRID M3-3020
2016
4 GB GDDR5
7.03
+1462%

M3-3020 outperforms 9400 GT by a whopping 1462% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5871304
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.69
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGM107G96C
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 May 2016 (9 years ago)27 August 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64016
Core clock speed1033 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1306 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate52.244.400
Floating-point processing power1.672 TFLOPS0.0448 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs408
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm168 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.03 0.45
Recency 18 May 2016 27 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

GRID M3-3020 has a 1462.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

The GRID M3-3020 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M3-3020 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9400 GT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GRID M3-3020
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
GeForce 9400 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 523 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M3-3020 or GeForce 9400 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.