RTX A3000 Mobile vs Quadro GV100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro GV100 Tesla PG500-216 Tesla V100 FHHL Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100 SMX2 Tesla V100 SXM2 Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
VS
RTX A1000 Embedded RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB RTX A2000 Max-Q RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4500 Embedded RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5500 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GV100 with RTX A3000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro GV100
2018
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
51.39
+58.9%

GV100 outperforms RTX A3000 Mobile by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking51168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.61no data
Power efficiency14.2331.98
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGV100GA104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date27 March 2018 (6 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51204096
Core clock speed1132 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1627 MHz1230 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate520.6157.4
Floating-point processing power16.66 TFLOPS10.08 TFLOPS
ROPs12864
TMUs320128
Tensor Cores640128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB6 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s264.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.08.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro GV100 51.39
+58.9%
RTX A3000 Mobile 32.34

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro GV100 19824
+58.9%
RTX A3000 Mobile 12476

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD160−170
+52.4%
105
−52.4%
1440p80−85
+56.9%
51
−56.9%
4K65−70
+47.7%
44
−47.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p56.24no data
1440p112.49no data
4K138.45no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 77
+0%
77
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
+0%
79
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+0%
66
+0%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Hitman 3 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 68
+0%
68
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 53
+0%
53
+0%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Hitman 3 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 134
+0%
134
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51
+0%
51
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 43
+0%
43
+0%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Hitman 3 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 114
+0%
114
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 114
+0%
114
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
+0%
61
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 39
+0%
39
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hitman 3 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 86
+0%
86
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51
+0%
51
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how Quadro GV100 and RTX A3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GV100 is 52% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro GV100 is 57% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro GV100 is 48% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 51.39 32.34
Recency 27 March 2018 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 70 Watt

Quadro GV100 has a 58.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX A3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.

The Quadro GV100 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A3000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro GV100 is a workstation card while RTX A3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
Pro W6800 Radeon Pro W6800
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
vs
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
Pro W6900X Radeon Pro W6900X
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
A10G A10G
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
A30 PCIe A30 PCIe
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
A10 PCIe A10 PCIe
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6600 XT
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
T1000 T1000
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
T600 T600
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
A100 PCIe 80 GB A100 PCIe 80 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 52 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 125 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.