UHD Graphics 615 vs GRID K340

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1 K100 K120Q K140Q K160Q K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
600 605 610 615 617 620 630 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K340 with UHD Graphics 615, including specs and performance data.

GRID K340
2013, $3,299
1 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
2.90
+58.5%

K340 outperforms Graphics 615 by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID K340 GRID K340
UHD Graphics 615 UHD Graphics 615

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking822967
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.999.39
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGK107Amber Lake GT2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)7 November 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384 ×4192
Core clock speed950 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate30.40 ×421.60
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS ×40.3456 TFLOPS
ROPs8 ×43
TMUs32 ×424
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×4System Shared
Memory bus width64 Bit ×4System Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s ×4no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
+40%
10
−40%

Cost per frame, $

1080p235.64no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 8
+0%
8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 1
+0%
1
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GRID K340 and UHD Graphics 615 compete in popular games:

  • GRID K340 is 40% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 49 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.90 1.83
Recency 23 July 2013 7 November 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 15 Watt

GRID K340 has a 58.5% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 615, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

The GRID K340 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 615 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K340 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 615 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID K340
GRID K340
Intel UHD Graphics 615
UHD Graphics 615
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
UHD Graphics 615 UHD Graphics 615
vs
GTX 850A GeForce GTX 850A
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
FireStream 9250 FireStream 9250
GRID K340 NVIDIA GRID K340
vs
HD 7950 Boost HD 7950 Boost
GRID K340 NVIDIA GRID K340
vs
HD 7650M Rebrand HD 7650M Rebrand
GRID K340 NVIDIA GRID K340
vs
ATI Rage Fury MAXX Fury MAXX
GRID K340 NVIDIA GRID K340
vs
8400 GS GeForce 8400 GS
GRID K340 NVIDIA GRID K340
vs
Tesla C870 Tesla C870
GRID K340 NVIDIA GRID K340
vs
Instinct Vega Instinct Vega
GRID K340 NVIDIA GRID K340
vs
GTX 470 PhysX Edition GTX 470 PhysX Edition
GRID K340 NVIDIA GRID K340
vs
R8 M535DX R8 M535DX
GRID K340 NVIDIA GRID K340
vs
T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1000 Max-Q
GRID K340 NVIDIA GRID K340
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1 1 vote

Rate GRID K340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 59 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 615 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K340 or UHD Graphics 615, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.