UHD Graphics 605 vs GRID K340

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1 K100 K120Q K160Q K180Q K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
600 605 610 615 617 620 630 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K340 with UHD Graphics 605, including specs and performance data.

GRID K340
2013, $3,299
1 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
2.90
+169%

K340 outperforms Graphics 605 by a whopping 169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID K340 GRID K340
UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 605

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8201132
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.9916.62
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGK107Gemini Lake GT1.5
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)11 December 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384 ×4144
Core clock speed950 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt5 Watt
Texture fill rate30.40 ×413.50
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS ×40.216 TFLOPS
ROPs8 ×43
TMUs32 ×418
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×4System Shared
Memory bus width64 Bit ×4System Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s ×4no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
+150%
12
−150%
1440p60−65
+150%
24
−150%
4K40−45
+167%
15
−167%

Cost per frame, $

1080p109.97no data
1440p54.98no data
4K82.48no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1
+0%
1
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GRID K340 and UHD Graphics 605 compete in popular games:

  • GRID K340 is 150% faster in 1080p
  • GRID K340 is 150% faster in 1440p
  • GRID K340 is 167% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 44 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.90 1.08
Recency 23 July 2013 11 December 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 5 Watt

GRID K340 has a 168.5% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 605, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 4400% lower power consumption.

The GRID K340 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 605 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K340 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 605 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID K340
GRID K340
Intel UHD Graphics 605
UHD Graphics 605
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
FireStream 9250 FireStream 9250
UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 605
vs
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
NVS 810 NVS 810
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
ATI V3800 FirePro V3800
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
ATI V8800 FirePro V8800
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
RX 560D Radeon RX 560D
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
RX Vega 64 Nano Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
2270 PCIe x1 FirePro 2270 PCIe x1
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
RX 580 OEM Radeon RX 580 OEM
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
RX 550X Radeon RX 550X
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
RX 580X Radeon RX 580X
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
RX 550X 640SP Radeon RX 550X 640SP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1 1 vote

Rate GRID K340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 933 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 605 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K340 or UHD Graphics 605, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.