HD Graphics 500 vs GRID K340

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1 K100 K120Q K140Q K160Q K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
500 505 510 515 520 530

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K340 with HD Graphics 500, including specs and performance data.

GRID K340
2013, $3,299
1 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
2.89
+301%

K340 outperforms HD Graphics 500 by a whopping 301% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID K340 GRID K340
HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8221223
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.999.22
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameGK107Apollo Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)1 September 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384 ×496
Core clock speed950 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data650 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate30.40 ×47.800
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS ×40.1248 TFLOPS
ROPs8 ×42
TMUs32 ×412
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×4System Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s ×4no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+300%
10
−300%
1440p4−5
+300%
1
−300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p82.48no data
1440p824.75no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 6
+0%
6
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 5
+0%
5
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1
+0%
1
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GRID K340 and HD Graphics 500 compete in popular games:

  • GRID K340 is 300% faster in 1080p
  • GRID K340 is 300% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 37 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.89 0.72
Recency 23 July 2013 1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 10 Watt

GRID K340 has a 301.4% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 2150% lower power consumption.

The GRID K340 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 500 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K340 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 500 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID K340
GRID K340
Intel HD Graphics 500
HD Graphics 500
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
NVS 810 NVS 810
HD Graphics 500 HD Graphics 500
vs
GeForce 610M GeForce 610M
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
FireStream 9250 FireStream 9250
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5650 Radeon HD 5650
GRID K120Q GRID K120Q
vs
ATI FireMV 2260 FireMV 2260
GRID K120Q GRID K120Q
vs
Instinct Vega Instinct Vega
GRID K500 GRID K500
vs
RTX 3070 16 GB RTX 3070 16 GB
Tesla K40c Tesla K40c
vs
GTX 570 Rev. 2 GTX 570 Rev. 2
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
Stream Processor Stream Processor
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
HD Graphics 3000 Graphics 3000
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 RTX 3060 12 GB GA104
GRID K100 GRID K100
vs
8600M GT Mac Edition GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition
GRID K100 GRID K100
vs
FX 4400G FX 4400G

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1 1 vote

Rate GRID K340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 778 votes

Rate HD Graphics 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K340 or HD Graphics 500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.