Radeon RX 6750 XT vs GRID K240Q

GRID K2 GRID K220Q GRID K260Q GRID K280Q GRID K520 GRID K520Q Quadro 4100 Quadro K4200 Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000 Mac Edition Tesla K8 Tesla K10
VS
Radeon RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6750 GRE Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K240Q with Radeon RX 6750 XT, including specs and performance data.

GRID K240Q
2013
1 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
6.12

RX 6750 XT outperforms GRID K240Q by a whopping 717% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID K240Q GRID K240Q
RX 6750 XT RX 6750 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking58556
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.4652.02
Power efficiency1.9914.66
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK104Navi 22
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2013 (11 years ago)3 March 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$469 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 6750 XT has 3463% better value for money than GRID K240Q.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362560
Core clock speed745 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36416.0
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs128160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GRID K240Q 6.12
RX 6750 XT 50.02
+717%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GRID K240Q 2541
RX 6750 XT 20767
+717%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−806%
163
+806%
1440p10−12
−780%
88
+780%
4K6−7
−733%
50
+733%

Cost per frame, $

1080p26.06
−674%
3.37
+674%
1440p46.90
−652%
6.24
+652%
4K78.17
−612%
10.98
+612%
  • RX 6750 XT has 674% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT has 652% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT has 612% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 353
+0%
353
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 165
+0%
165
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 171
+0%
171
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 346
+0%
346
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 127
+0%
127
+0%
Far Cry 5 178
+0%
178
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 217
+0%
217
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 141
+0%
141
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220
+0%
220
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 109
+0%
109
+0%
Dota 2 154
+0%
154
+0%
Far Cry 5 170
+0%
170
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 186
+0%
186
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 106
+0%
106
+0%
Metro Exodus 127
+0%
127
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 245
+0%
245
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+0%
98
+0%
Dota 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Far Cry 5 158
+0%
158
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 79
+0%
79
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135
+0%
135
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+0%
106
+0%
Metro Exodus 76
+0%
76
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
+0%
60
+0%
Far Cry 5 141
+0%
141
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 58
+0%
58
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 104
+0%
104
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+0%
79
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Dota 2 101
+0%
101
+0%
Far Cry 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 31
+0%
31
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

This is how GRID K240Q and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 806% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 780% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 733% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.12 50.02
Recency 28 June 2013 3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 250 Watt

GRID K240Q has 11.1% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 717.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K240Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K240Q is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID K240Q
GRID K240Q
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID K240Q GRID K240Q
vs
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6750 XT
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GRID K240Q GRID K240Q
vs
PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 3100
GRID K160Q GRID K160Q
vs
GeForce MX550 MX550
GRID K160Q GRID K160Q
vs
RTX 4070 GDDR6 RTX 4070 GDDR6
GRID K180Q GRID K180Q
vs
RTX 4070 GDDR6 RTX 4070 GDDR6
GRID K200 GRID K200
vs
GT 340 OEM GT 340 OEM
GRID K240Q GRID K240Q
vs
GRID K260Q GRID K260Q
GRID K260Q GRID K260Q
vs
Tesla K20X Tesla K20X
GRID K260Q GRID K260Q
vs
RTX 5060 Mobile RTX 5060 Mobile
GRID K280Q GRID K280Q
vs
RTX 6000 RTX 6000
GRID K2 GRID K2
vs
Tesla M1060 Tesla M1060
GRID K2 GRID K2
vs
GTX 1650 GDDR6 GTX 1650 GDDR6

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate GRID K240Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2819 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K240Q or Radeon RX 6750 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.