ATI Radeon 9600 PRO vs GRID K240Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K240Q with Radeon 9600 PRO, including specs and performance data.

GRID K240Q
2013, $469
1 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
6.08
+5980%

K240Q outperforms 9600 PRO by a whopping 5980% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6341516
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.59no data
Power efficiency2.080.43
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameGK104RV350
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2013 (12 years ago)1 October 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$469 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed745 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate95.361.600
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1284
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s9.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GRID K240Q 6.08
+5980%
ATI 9600 PRO 0.10

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GRID K240Q 2541
+5950%
Samples: 8
ATI 9600 PRO 42
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.08 0.10
Recency 28 June 2013 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 18 Watt

GRID K240Q has a 5980% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9600 PRO, on the other hand, has 1150% lower power consumption.

The GRID K240Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9600 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K240Q is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9600 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K240Q
GRID K240Q
ATI Radeon 9600 PRO
Radeon 9600 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GRID K240Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 78 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K240Q or Radeon 9600 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.