FirePro W4100 vs GRID K2

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GRID K2
2013
4 GB GDDR5
7.07
+79%

GRID K2 outperforms FirePro W4100 by 79% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking512654
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money1.970.17
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameGK104Cape Verde
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date11 May 2013 (10 years ago)2 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,199 no data
Current price$9.89 (0x MSRP)$916

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GRID K2 has 1059% better value for money than FirePro W4100.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536512
Core clock speed745 MHz630 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate95.3620.16
Floating-point performance2x 2,289 gflops645.1 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm171 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorno datalow profile / half length
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5 GB/s4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort
Dual-link DVI supportno data1

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)5.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1751.2.131
CUDA3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GRID K2 7.07
+79%
FirePro W4100 3.95

GRID K2 outperforms FirePro W4100 by 79% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GRID K2 2736
+79.1%
FirePro W4100 1528

GRID K2 outperforms FirePro W4100 by 79% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
+68.8%
16
−68.8%
4K5−6
+66.7%
3
−66.7%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 7.07 3.95
Recency 11 May 2013 2 October 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 50 Watt

The GRID K2 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W4100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K2
GRID K2
AMD FirePro W4100
FirePro W4100

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 13 votes

Rate GRID K2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 71 vote

Rate FirePro W4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.