GeForce 210 vs GRID A100B

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGA100GT218
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)12 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$29.49

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores691216
Core clock speed900 MHz589 MHz
Boost clock speed1005 MHzno data
Number of transistors54,200 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt30.5 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate434.24.160
Floating-point processing power13.89 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs1924
TMUs4328
Tensor Cores432no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Heightno data2.731" (6.9 cm)
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR2
Maximum RAM amount48 GB512 MB
Memory bus width6144 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,866 GB/s8.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDVIVGADisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.63.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.0+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 30 Watt

GRID A100B has an age advantage of 10 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 210, on the other hand, has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID A100B and GeForce 210. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID A100B is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 210 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID A100B
GRID A100B
NVIDIA GeForce 210
GeForce 210

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate GRID A100B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 3592 votes

Rate GeForce 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.