GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs GMA X4500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated44
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 5.0 (2008)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameEaglelakeGN21-X9
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 June 2008 (16 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$114 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores807424
Core clock speed533 MHz1860 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2280 MHz
Number of transistorsno data35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate2.132386.3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GMA X4500 and GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared20000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDAno data8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2008 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 150 Watt

GMA X4500 has 1053.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA X4500 and GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA X4500 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA X4500
GMA X4500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 317 votes

Rate GMA X4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 470 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.