UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) vs GMA 500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated735
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX535 (2008−2010)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code namePoulsboRocket Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 March 2008 (16 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3232
Core clock speed200 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Texture fill rate0.8no data
Floating-point processing power0.0128 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112_1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGLES 2.0no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2008 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 500 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA 500
GMA 500
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 15 votes

Rate GMA 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.