RTX A2000 12 GB vs GMA 500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated133
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.00
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX535 (2008−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code namePoulsboGA106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 March 2008 (16 years ago)23 November 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores323328
Core clock speed200 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rate0.8124.8
Floating-point performance0.0128 gflops7.987 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGLES 2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2008 23 November 2021
Chip lithography 130 nm 8 nm

RTX A2000 12 GB has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 500 and RTX A2000 12 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA 500
GMA 500
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX A2000 12 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 15 votes

Rate GMA 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 129 votes

Rate RTX A2000 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.