RV250 vs GK208B

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	GK208B	RV250
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	no data	no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	no data
Number of transistors	1,020 million	36 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	150 nm

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

NVENC	No Support	no data
PureVideo HD	VP5	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	8.1
Shader Model	6.5 (5.1)	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
OpenCL	3.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.175	N/A
CUDA	3.5	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Chip lithography

28 nm

150 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---