GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile vs FirePro W9100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W9100 with GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W9100
2014
16 GB GDDR5, 750 Watt
18.53

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile outperforms W9100 by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking33190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.1930.42
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameHawaiiGA103S
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date26 March 2014 (12 years ago)25 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28167424
Core clock speed930 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1260 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate163.7292.3
Floating-point processing power5.238 TFLOPS18.71 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs176232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58
L1 Cache704 KB7.3 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs
StereoOutput3D+-
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro W9100 18.53
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 45.43
+145%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W9100 7747
Samples: 39
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 18946
+145%
Samples: 1710

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
−156%
141
+156%
1440p35−40
−154%
89
+154%
4K24−27
−146%
59
+146%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 136
+0%
136
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 172
+0%
172
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220
+0%
220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 124
+0%
124
+0%
Far Cry 5 147
+0%
147
+0%
Fortnite 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 179
+0%
179
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
+0%
102
+0%
Dota 2 158
+0%
158
+0%
Far Cry 5 140
+0%
140
+0%
Fortnite 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 116
+0%
116
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 146
+0%
146
+0%
Metro Exodus 110
+0%
110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 223
+0%
223
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
+0%
91
+0%
Dota 2 151
+0%
151
+0%
Far Cry 5 132
+0%
132
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+0%
118
+0%
Valorant 292
+0%
292
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 120
+0%
120
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+0%
101
+0%
Metro Exodus 73
+0%
73
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry 5 116
+0%
116
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+0%
86
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120
+0%
120
+0%
Metro Exodus 48
+0%
48
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+0%
85
+0%
Valorant 347
+0%
347
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+0%
28
+0%
Dota 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

This is how FirePro W9100 and RTX 3080 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 156% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 154% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 146% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.53 45.43
Recency 26 March 2014 25 January 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 750 Watt 115 Watt

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile has a 145% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 552% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W9100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W9100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 19 votes

Rate FirePro W9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 376 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W9100 or GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.