GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs FirePro W8100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W8100 with GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W8100
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 220 Watt
19.07

RTX 2060 Mobile outperforms W8100 by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking295186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.9818.27
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameHawaiiTU106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 June 2014 (10 years ago)29 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601920
Core clock speed824 MHz960 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate131.8144.0
Floating-point processing power4.219 TFLOPS4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs160120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x SDINo outputs
G-SYNC support-+
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
−60%
104
+60%
1440p40−45
−65%
66
+65%
4K24−27
−75%
42
+75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Elden Ring 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 149
+0%
149
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100
+0%
100
+0%
Valorant 140
+0%
140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+0%
24
+0%
Dota 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Elden Ring 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 123
+0%
123
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+0%
90
+0%
Metro Exodus 61
+0%
61
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 247
+0%
247
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 81
+0%
81
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 76
+0%
76
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
+0%
21
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 122
+0%
122
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 107
+0%
107
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 123
+0%
123
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Elden Ring 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
World of Tanks 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 87
+0%
87
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Elden Ring 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 98
+0%
98
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 87
+0%
87
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 41
+0%
41
+0%

This is how FirePro W8100 and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 60% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 65% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 75% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.07 30.45
Recency 23 June 2014 29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 115 Watt

FirePro W8100 has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 59.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 91.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W8100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W8100 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W8100
FirePro W8100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 18 votes

Rate FirePro W8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1703 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.