GeForce 8800 GT vs FirePro W5130M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W5130M with GeForce 8800 GT, including specs and performance data.

W5130M
2015
2 GB GDDR5
3.51
+203%

W5130M outperforms 8800 GT by a whopping 203% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7341076
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.03
Power efficiencyno data0.66
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTropoG92
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date2 October 2015 (9 years ago)29 October 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512112
Core clock speed900 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data105 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate29.6033.60
Floating-point processing power0.9472 TFLOPS0.336 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Heightno dataSingle Slot
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options-2-way

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s57.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVIHDTV
Multi monitor supportno data+
Eyefinity+-
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)no data128bit

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

W5130M 3.51
+203%
8800 GT 1.16

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

W5130M 1405
+203%
8800 GT 463

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
+213%
8−9
−213%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data43.63

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Fortnite 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Valorant 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+250%
18−20
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Dota 2 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Fortnite 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+233%
3−4
−233%
Valorant 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Dota 2 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Valorant 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
Fortnite 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+213%
8−9
−213%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+213%
8−9
−213%
Valorant 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Fortnite 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Valorant 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Fortnite 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

This is how W5130M and 8800 GT compete in popular games:

  • W5130M is 213% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.51 1.16
Recency 2 October 2015 29 October 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

W5130M has a 202.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro W5130M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W5130M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 8800 GT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W5130M
FirePro W5130M
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
GeForce 8800 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4
71 vote

Rate FirePro W5130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3
622 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W5130M or GeForce 8800 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.