Radeon E6760 vs FirePro W4300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W4300 with Radeon E6760, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W4300
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.54
+230%

W4300 outperforms E6760 by a whopping 230% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking579903
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.13
Power efficiency10.533.54
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameBonaireTurks
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 December 2015 (9 years ago)2 May 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$239.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768480
Core clock speed930 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate44.6414.40
Floating-point processing power1.428 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs4824
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length171 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz3200 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.0
Shader Model6.35.0
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro W4300 6.54
+230%
Radeon E6760 1.98

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W4300 Samples: 61 2894
+230%
Radeon E6760 Samples: 13 876

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.54 1.98
Recency 1 December 2015 2 May 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

FirePro W4300 has a 230.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Radeon E6760, on the other hand, has 11.1% lower power consumption.

The FirePro W4300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E6760 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W4300 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon E6760 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W4300
FirePro W4300
AMD Radeon E6760
Radeon E6760

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 41 votes

Rate FirePro W4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate Radeon E6760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W4300 or Radeon E6760, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.