Radeon R7 350 640SP vs FirePro S9050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking437not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.96no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiCape Verde
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 August 2014 (11 years ago)7 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792640
Core clock speed900 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate100.837.00
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPS1.184 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs11240
L1 Cache448 KB160 KB
L2 Cache768 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length254 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth264 GB/s72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2014 7 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 55 Watt

FirePro S9050 has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

R7 350 640SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 309.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9050 and Radeon R7 350 640SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S9050 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350 640SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S9050
FirePro S9050
AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP
Radeon R7 350 640SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro S9050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Radeon R7 350 640SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9050 or Radeon R7 350 640SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.