RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs FirePro W4300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
W2100 W4000 W4100 W4130M W4150M W4300 W5000 W5100 W7000 W7100 W8100 W9000
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile PRO 1000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W4300 with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W4300
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.84

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms W4300 by a whopping 413% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro W4300 FirePro W4300
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking591158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.6060.43
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameBonaireGB206
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 December 2015 (9 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683328
Core clock speed930 MHz952 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1455 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate44.64151.3
Floating-point processing power1.428 TFLOPS9.684 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs48104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26
L1 Cache192 KB3.3 MB
L2 Cache256 KB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length171 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−442%
130
+442%
1440p12−14
−475%
69
+475%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 88
+0%
88
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how FirePro W4300 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 442% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 475% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.84 35.08
Recency 1 December 2015 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has a 412.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W4300 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W4300 is a workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro W4300
FirePro W4300
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro W4300 FirePro W4300
vs
Pro V340 MxGPU Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
FirePro W4300 FirePro W4300
vs
GRID K280Q GRID K280Q
RTX 4060 RTX 4060
vs
RX 580 XTR RX 580 XTR
GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
vs
GT 1030 GT 1030
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
GT 1030 GT 1030
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
Pro WX 5100 Pro WX 5100
RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT
vs
Pro WX 4100 Pro WX 4100
RTX 2080 Ti RTX 2080 Ti
vs
FirePro W9100 W9100
R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
vs
FirePro D300 D300
Graphics 512SP Graphics 512SP
vs
FirePro D300 D300
Graphics 512SP Mobile Graphics 512SP Mobile
vs
FirePro D300 D300
RTX 3070 Mobile RTX 3070 Mobile
vs
FirePro R5000 R5000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 41 votes

Rate FirePro W4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W4300 or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.