H200 SXM 141 GB vs FirePro V7900 SDI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Hopper (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCaymanGH100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date24 May 2011 (13 years ago)18 November 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128016896
Core clock speed725 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1980 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)224 Watt700 Watt
Texture fill rate58.001,045
Floating-point processing power1.856 TFLOPS66.91 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs80528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length279 mm267 mm
Width1-slotSXM Module
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB141 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s3.36 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x SDINo outputs
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.0N/A
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-9.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2011 18 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 141 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 224 Watt 700 Watt

V7900 SDI has 212.5% lower power consumption.

H200 SXM 141 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6950% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V7900 SDI and H200 SXM 141 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
FirePro V7900 SDI
NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB
H200 SXM 141 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate FirePro V7900 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10 votes

Rate H200 SXM 141 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V7900 SDI or H200 SXM 141 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.