Iris Plus Graphics vs FirePro W4190M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W4190M with Iris Plus Graphics, including specs and performance data.

W4190M
2015
2 GB GDDR5
2.65

Plus Graphics outperforms W4190M by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking829707
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.84
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameOpalIce Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date12 November 2015 (9 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed825 MHzno data
Boost clock speed900 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate21.6032.00
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2432
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

W4190M 2.65
Iris Plus Graphics 4.05
+52.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

W4190M 1170
Samples: 86
Iris Plus Graphics 1792
+53.2%
Samples: 4031

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Fortnite 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Valorant 45−50
−44.4%
65−70
+44.4%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−48.1%
80−85
+48.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Dota 2 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Fortnite 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 12
−50%
18−20
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−40%
14−16
+40%
Valorant 45−50
−44.4%
65−70
+44.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Dota 2 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−50%
9−10
+50%
Valorant 45−50
−44.4%
65−70
+44.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Valorant 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Valorant 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

This is how W4190M and Iris Plus Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Iris Plus Graphics is 45% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.65 4.05
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

Iris Plus Graphics has a 52.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Plus Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W4190M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W4190M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W4190M
FirePro W4190M
Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 27 votes

Rate FirePro W4190M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 470 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W4190M or Iris Plus Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.