Riva 128 vs FirePro W4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking695not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.43no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)no data
GPU code nameCape VerdeNV3
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 August 2014 (10 years ago)1 April 1997 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed630 MHz100 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million4 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate20.160.1
Floating-point processing power0.6451 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs321

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 2x
Length171 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Form factorlow profile / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s1.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x VGA, 1x DB13W3
Dual-link DVI support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)5.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2014 1 April 1997
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 350 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 4 Watt

FirePro W4100 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

Riva 128, on the other hand, has 1150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W4100 and Riva 128. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W4100 is a workstation graphics card while Riva 128 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W4100
FirePro W4100
NVIDIA Riva 128
Riva 128

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 73 votes

Rate FirePro W4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 38 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.