Radeon 740M vs FirePro W4100

Place in the ranking	705	513
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.44	37.94
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Cape Verde	Phoenix
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 August 2014 (10 years ago)	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	256
Core clock speed	630 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2500 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.16	40.00
Floating-point processing power	0.6451 TFLOPS	2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	8
TMUs	32	16
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	171 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Form factor	low profile / half length	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
Dual-link DVI support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W4100 3.69

Radeon 740M 7.72
+109%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W4100 1521

Radeon 740M 3182
+109%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

FirePro W4100 1665

Radeon 740M 5135
+208%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	17 −23.5%	21 +23.5%
4K	3 −100%	6−7 +100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −60%	16 +60%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −161%	47 +161%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −233%	20−22 +233%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −144%	21−24 +144%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −76.9%	21−24 +76.9%
Valorant	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −40%	14 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
Dota 2	12−14 −150%	30 +150%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +0%	21 +0%
Fortnite	21−24 −113%	45−50 +113%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −106%	37 +106%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −233%	20−22 +233%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −142%	27−30 +142%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −144%	21−24 +144%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −88.6%	65−70 +88.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −76.9%	21−24 +76.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −78.6%	24−27 +78.6%
Valorant	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
World of Tanks	65−70 −85.1%	120−130 +85.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −10%	11 +10%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
Dota 2	12−14 −100%	24−27 +100%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −66.7%	30 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −233%	20−22 +233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −88.6%	65−70 +88.6%
Valorant	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
World of Tanks	27−30 −114%	60−65 +114%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Forza Horizon 5	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%
Valorant	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Dota 2	16−18 −18.8%	18−20 +18.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −18.8%	18−20 +18.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −18.8%	18−20 +18.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Dota 2	16−18 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Fortnite	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Valorant	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus

3−4

+0%

3−4

+0%

This is how FirePro W4100 and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:

Radeon 740M is 24% faster in 1080p
Radeon 740M is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 740M is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Radeon 740M is ahead in 59 tests (97%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.69	7.72
Recency	13 August 2014	4 January 2023
Chip lithography	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	15 Watt

Radeon 740M has a 109.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 740M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W4100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W4100 is a workstation card while Radeon 740M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.