Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs FirePro W4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W4100 with Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W4100
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.78

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms W4100 by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking704534
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.4518.62
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameCape VerdeTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2014 (10 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51280
Core clock speed630 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate20.16no data
Floating-point processing power0.6451 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length171 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorlow profile / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortno data
Dual-link DVI support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W4100 3.78
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.23
+91.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

FirePro W4100 1665
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 4010
+141%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

FirePro W4100 12657
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21931
+73.3%

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

FirePro W4100 20
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 44
+118%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−11.8%
19
+11.8%
1440p5−6
−120%
11
+120%
4K3
−400%
15
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−10%
11
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14
+55.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−20%
12
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−33.3%
12
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−66.7%
30
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−133%
14
+133%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−200%
27
+200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Valorant 9−10
−100%
18
+100%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5
−80%
Dota 2 12−14
−83.3%
22
+83.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−23.8%
26
+23.8%
Fortnite 21−24
−95.7%
45−50
+95.7%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−33.3%
24
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−8.3%
13
+8.3%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−88.9%
17
+88.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−74.3%
60−65
+74.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+117%
6
−117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−64.3%
21−24
+64.3%
Valorant 9−10
−55.6%
14
+55.6%
World of Tanks 65−70
−71.6%
110−120
+71.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4
−125%
Dota 2 12−14
−200%
36
+200%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−57.1%
30−35
+57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−11.1%
20
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−50%
9
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−74.3%
60−65
+74.3%
Valorant 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
−100%
6
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−100%
6
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−44.4%
35−40
+44.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
World of Tanks 27−30
−96.4%
55−60
+96.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−220%
16
+220%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−42.9%
10
+42.9%
Valorant 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Metro Exodus 0−1 4−5
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−100%
21−24
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Fortnite 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Valorant 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

This is how FirePro W4100 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 12% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 120% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the FirePro W4100 is 125% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • FirePro W4100 is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 53 tests (85%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.78 7.23
Recency 13 August 2014 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 28 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has a 91.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 78.6% lower power consumption.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W4100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W4100 is a workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W4100
FirePro W4100
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 75 votes

Rate FirePro W4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 940 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.