HD Graphics 4600 vs FirePro W2100

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W2100 with HD Graphics 4600, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W2100
2014
2 GB DDR3, 26 Watt
2.35
+27%

W2100 outperforms HD Graphics 4600 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking849919
Place by popularitynot in top-10064
Power efficiency6.246.38
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameOlandHaswell GT2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 August 2014 (10 years ago)27 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320160
Core clock speed630 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed680 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors950 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate13.6022.00
Floating-point processing power0.4352 TFLOPS0.352 TFLOPS
ROPs82
TMUs2020

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8Ring Bus
Width1-slotno data
Form factorlow profile / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
DisplayPort count2no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W2100 2.35
+27%
HD Graphics 4600 1.85

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W2100 903
+27.2%
HD Graphics 4600 710

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

FirePro W2100 1085
+70.7%
HD Graphics 4600 636

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

FirePro W2100 7771
+38.4%
HD Graphics 4600 5613

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

FirePro W2100 15
+3.8%
HD Graphics 4600 14

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p16−18
+14.3%
14
−14.3%
Full HD13
+18.2%
11
−18.2%
4K2
+100%
1−2
−100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Elden Ring 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+50%
6
−50%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 5−6
−100%
10
+100%
Elden Ring 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−14.3%
16
+14.3%
Fortnite 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+25%
4
−25%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+22.2%
18
−22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+80%
5
−80%
World of Tanks 40−45
+63%
27
−63%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
World of Tanks 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how FirePro W2100 and HD Graphics 4600 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro W2100 is 14% faster in 900p
  • FirePro W2100 is 18% faster in 1080p
  • FirePro W2100 is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the FirePro W2100 is 200% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics 4600 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • FirePro W2100 is ahead in 27 tests (55%)
  • HD Graphics 4600 is ahead in 2 tests (4%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (41%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.35 1.85
Recency 12 August 2014 27 May 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 45 Watt

FirePro W2100 has a 27% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 73.1% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics 4600, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro W2100 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W2100 is a workstation card while HD Graphics 4600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W2100
FirePro W2100
Intel HD Graphics 4600
HD Graphics 4600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 94 votes

Rate FirePro W2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 2541 vote

Rate HD Graphics 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.