FirePro W4000 vs HD Graphics 4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking979not rated
Place by popularity96not in top-100
Power efficiency6.52no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2Pitcairn
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date27 May 2013 (12 years ago)7 August 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160768
Core clock speed400 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate22.0039.60
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS1.267 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs2048
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data183 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data102.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2013 7 August 2012
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 75 Watt

HD Graphics 4600 has an age advantage of 9 months, a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4600 and FirePro W4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4600 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro W4000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4600
HD Graphics 4600
AMD FirePro W4000
FirePro W4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 2929 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4600 or FirePro W4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.