Radeon Pro V620 vs FirePro V5900

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking737not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.03no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameCaymanNavi 21
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date24 May 2011 (13 years ago)4 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124608
Core clock speed600 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate19.20633.6
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS20.28 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs32288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length230 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2011 4 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

FirePro V5900 has 300% lower power consumption.

Pro V620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V5900 and Radeon Pro V620. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V5900
FirePro V5900
AMD Radeon Pro V620
Radeon Pro V620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 48 votes

Rate FirePro V5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.