Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile vs FirePro V5900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking812not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.02no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameCaymanRenoir
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date24 May 2011 (14 years ago)6 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512384
Core clock speed600 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2036.00
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS1.152 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs3224
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length230 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2011 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics 384SP Mobile has an age advantage of 8 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V5900 and Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V5900 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V5900
FirePro V5900
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 54 votes

Rate FirePro V5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V5900 or Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.