GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand vs FirePro V5900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking810not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.01no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameCaymanGK104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date24 May 2011 (14 years ago)25 August 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121152
Core clock speed600 MHz823 MHz
Boost clock speedno data888 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2085.25
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS2.046 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs3296
L1 Cache128 KB96 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length230 mm241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s179.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2011 25 August 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 130 Watt

FirePro V5900 has 73.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 760 OEM Rebrand, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V5900 and GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V5900 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V5900
FirePro V5900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 54 votes

Rate FirePro V5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V5900 or GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.