FirePro V3900 vs V5800

#ad
Buy on Amazon
DVI
VS

Aggregated performance score

ATI V5800
2010
1024 MB GDDR5
3.66
+119%

V5800 outperforms V3900 by 119% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking672894
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.370.20
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameJuniperTurks
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date26 April 2010 (14 years ago)7 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$479 no data
Current price$354 (0.7x MSRP)$110

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI V5800 has 85% better value for money than FirePro V3900.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800480
Core clock speed690 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)74 Watt199 Watt
Texture fill rate27.6015.60
Floating-point performance1,104.0 gflops624.0 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Form factorno datahalf height / half length
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s28 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI supportno data1
HD сomponent video outputno data1

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI V5800 3.66
+119%
FirePro V3900 1.67

V5800 outperforms V3900 by 119% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI V5800 1415
+119%
FirePro V3900 646

V5800 outperforms V3900 by 119% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 3.66 1.67
Recency 26 April 2010 7 February 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 74 Watt 199 Watt

The FirePro V5800 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V3900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V5800
FirePro V5800
AMD FirePro V3900
FirePro V3900

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 90 votes

Rate FirePro V5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 87 votes

Rate FirePro V3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.