Quadro K2000M vs ATI FirePro V5700

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated808
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.30
Power efficiencyno data3.30
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRV730GK107
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date8 August 2008 (16 years ago)1 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $265.27

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320384
Core clock speed700 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors514 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)56 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate22.4023.84
Floating-point processing power0.448 TFLOPS0.5722 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A+
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2008 1 June 2012
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 56 Watt 55 Watt

K2000M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V5700 and Quadro K2000M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V5700 is a workstation card while Quadro K2000M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V5700
FirePro V5700
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Quadro K2000M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate FirePro V5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 33 votes

Rate Quadro K2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.