Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs ATI FirePro V3700

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated688
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.19
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameRV620Broadwell GT3e
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date8 August 2008 (16 years ago)5 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40384
Core clock speed800 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors181 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20038.40
Floating-point processing power0.064 TFLOPS0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs46
TMUs448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed950 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth15.2 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2008 5 September 2014
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 113.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V3700 and Iris Pro Graphics P6300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V3700 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V3700
FirePro V3700
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate FirePro V3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 13 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.