GeForce RTX 5090 vs FirePro S9300 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameCapsaicinGB202
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date31 March 2016 (8 years ago)2025
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409621760
Core clock speed850 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm0 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate217.61,714
Floating-point processing power6.963 TFLOPS109.7 TFLOPS
ROPs64192
TMUs256680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm304 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBMGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s1.42 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.06.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-10.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 500 Watt

S9300 X2 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9300 X2 and GeForce RTX 5090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S9300 X2
FirePro S9300 X2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 173 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.