GeForce RTX 5090 vs FirePro S9150

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameHawaiiGB202
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 August 2014 (10 years ago)30 January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores281621760
Core clock speed900 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million92,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt575 Watt
Texture fill rate158.41,637
Floating-point processing power5.069 TFLOPS104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs64192
TMUs176680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm304 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2209 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s1.79 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-10.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2014 30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 575 Watt

FirePro S9150 has 144.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9150 and GeForce RTX 5090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S9150 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S9150
FirePro S9150
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 12 votes

Rate FirePro S9150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 754 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.