Radeon 780M vs FirePro S9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FirePro S9000
2012
6 GB GDDR5, 350 Watt
13.10

Radeon 780M outperforms FirePro S9000 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking361283
Place by popularitynot in top-10057
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.60no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 3
GPU code nameTahitiPhoenix
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date24 August 2012 (11 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data
Current price$433 (0.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792768
Core clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data3000 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate100.8139.2
Floating-point performance3,226 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro S9000 and Radeon 780M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth264 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support1no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro S9000 13.10
Radeon 780M 18.35
+40.1%

Radeon 780M outperforms FirePro S9000 by 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro S9000 5059
Radeon 780M 7088
+40.1%

Radeon 780M outperforms FirePro S9000 by 40% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−50%
36
+50%
1440p14−16
−50%
21
+50%
4K9−10
−55.6%
14
+55.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−44.4%
39
+44.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−47.6%
30−35
+47.6%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−50%
60−65
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−54.2%
35−40
+54.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−47.6%
31
+47.6%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−43.3%
40−45
+43.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−63.3%
45−50
+63.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−52.7%
80−85
+52.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−49.2%
97
+49.2%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−52.5%
60−65
+52.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−45.7%
50−55
+45.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−42.2%
64
+42.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−51.9%
41
+51.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−47.6%
30−35
+47.6%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−50%
60−65
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−54.2%
35−40
+54.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−50%
24
+50%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−43.3%
40−45
+43.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−63.3%
45−50
+63.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−52.7%
80−85
+52.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−46%
70−75
+46%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−50%
21
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−45.7%
50−55
+45.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−51.4%
53
+51.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−53.3%
46
+53.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−60%
55−60
+60%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−47.6%
30−35
+47.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−54.2%
35−40
+54.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−43.8%
23
+43.8%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−43.3%
40−45
+43.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−52.7%
80−85
+52.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−51.4%
53
+51.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−53.3%
46
+53.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−61.1%
29
+61.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−50%
18
+50%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−45.7%
50−55
+45.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−43.8%
21−24
+43.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−50%
27
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Hitman 3 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−54.2%
35−40
+54.2%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−41.7%
30−35
+41.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−52.4%
32
+52.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−42.9%
20
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Hitman 3 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−50%
15
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−56.3%
24−27
+56.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%

This is how FirePro S9000 and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 780M is 50% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 780M is 50% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 780M is 56% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.10 18.35
Recency 24 August 2012 5 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 54 Watt

The Radeon 780M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro S9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro S9000 is a workstation card while Radeon 780M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S9000
FirePro S9000
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate FirePro S9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1073 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.