Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) vs FirePro S7150
Aggregate performance score
We've compared FirePro S7150 with Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), including specs and performance data.
S7150 outperforms 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 518 | 546 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 25 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.24 | no data |
Power efficiency | 4.60 | 41.83 |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) | Vega (2017−2020) |
GPU code name | Tonga | Vega |
Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2016 (9 years ago) | 7 January 2020 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,399 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | no data | 2100 MHz |
Number of transistors | 5,000 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | no data |
Floating-point processing power | 3.768 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 32 | no data |
TMUs | 128 | no data |
L1 Cache | 512 KB | no data |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
Length | 241 mm | no data |
Width | 1-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12_1 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
OpenCL | 2.0 | no data |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 24−27
+9.1%
| 22
−9.1%
|
1440p | 16−18
+0%
| 16
+0%
|
4K | 10−12
+0%
| 10
+0%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | 99.96 | no data |
1440p | 149.94 | no data |
4K | 239.90 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
Counter-Strike 2 | 63
+0%
|
63
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
Battlefield 5 | 39
+0%
|
39
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 43
+0%
|
43
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21
+0%
|
21
+0%
|
Fortnite | 47
+0%
|
47
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 33
+0%
|
33
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Valorant | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Full HD
High
Battlefield 5 | 33
+0%
|
33
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 19
+0%
|
19
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 48
+0%
|
48
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9
+0%
|
9
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 51
+0%
|
51
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 20
+0%
|
20
+0%
|
Fortnite | 31
+0%
|
31
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 28
+0%
|
28
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 10
+0%
|
10
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21
+0%
|
21
+0%
|
Valorant | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 30
+0%
|
30
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9
+0%
|
9
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 48
+0%
|
48
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 19
+0%
|
19
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
Valorant | 37
+0%
|
37
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
Fortnite | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
1440p
High
Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 21
+0%
|
21
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 9
+0%
|
9
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 10
+0%
|
10
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 22
+0%
|
22
+0%
|
Valorant | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 21
+0%
|
21
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5
+0%
|
5
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
Fortnite | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
4K
High
Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 10
+0%
|
10
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 6
+0%
|
6
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Valorant | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 8
+0%
|
8
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
4K
Epic
Fortnite | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
This is how FirePro S7150 and RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) compete in popular games:
- FirePro S7150 is 9% faster in 1080p
- A tie in 1440p
- A tie in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 8.53 | 7.76 |
Recency | 1 February 2016 | 7 January 2020 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
FirePro S7150 has a 9.9% higher aggregate performance score.
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FirePro S7150 and Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000).
Be aware that FirePro S7150 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.