GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs FirePro S10000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S10000 with GeForce 9800 GTX+, including specs and performance data.

S10000
2012
6 GB GDDR5, 750 Watt
10.26
+833%

S10000 outperforms 9800 GTX+ by a whopping 833% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4631100
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.230.04
Power efficiency2.210.63
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTahitiG92B
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 November 2012 (12 years ago)16 January 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 $229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

S10000 has 475% better value for money than 9800 GTX+.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×2128
Core clock speed825 MHz738 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Watt141 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate106.4 ×247.23
Floating-point processing power3.405 TFLOPS ×20.47 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×216
TMUs112 ×264
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length305 mm267 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×2512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1100 MHz
Memory bandwidth480 GB/s ×270.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPortHDTVDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Dual-link DVI support+-
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

S10000 10.26
+833%
9800 GTX+ 1.10

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

S10000 4537
+830%
Samples: 8
9800 GTX+ 488
Samples: 423

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.26 1.10
Recency 12 November 2012 16 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 750 Watt 141 Watt

S10000 has a 832.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

9800 GTX+, on the other hand, has 431.9% lower power consumption.

The FirePro S10000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GTX+ in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro S10000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9800 GTX+ is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S10000
FirePro S10000
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
GeForce 9800 GTX+

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 40 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 137 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S10000 or GeForce 9800 GTX+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.